Product · General practice
Many matter types, many people, one record.
A general practice has paralegals, assistants and attorneys using different AI tools on very different files. Candor gives the firm one way to screen, log and review all of it.
Where AI goes wrong in this work
- Each person picks their own AI tool, and nobody can say which ones the firm has approved or who has read the AI policy.
- Client details of every kind, from addresses to account numbers to medical terms, get pasted into those tools.
- Litigation work brings citation risk. In Oregon, fabricated citations cost two lawyers $110,204 in Couvrette v. Wisnovsky (D. Or. 2026), sanctions plus the other side’s fees.
What Candor does about it
- The firm lists its approved AI tools, and any logged use of a tool not on the list is flagged.
- Staff acknowledge the firm’s AI policy with a timestamp, and again when it changes. Staff seats are free.
- The browser panel puts screening, citation checks and logging inside the AI tools people already use. See connectors.
- A firm-wide summary for any date range shows every use, what is waiting on review, and what was signed off.
Screening and citation flags reduce risk; they don’t remove it. The attorney’s review is what counts, and Candor records it.